Neutrality / Unbiased

Neutrality / UnbiasedNeutrality / UnbiasedNeutrality / Unbiased

Neutrality / Unbiased

Neutrality / UnbiasedNeutrality / UnbiasedNeutrality / Unbiased
  • Home
  • About
  • Party Platform
  • Donate
  • Contact
  • More
    • Home
    • About
    • Party Platform
    • Donate
    • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Party Platform
  • Donate
  • Contact

Neutrality Party Philosophy

"You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time."


This quote is often attributed to Abraham Lincoln, although evidence is weak. 

It highlights the eventual Failure of Deception and the Triumph of Truth. 


Some of the American people will agree with all of the 

Neutrality Party's Platform Planks. 

Some of the American people will align with none of these Planks. 

And never will there be a time that every American will side with every one 

of the Party's Planks.


For those that feel a connection with these Party Planks, 

join the Movement and let the Revolution begin.


Philosophy

Originating from the Greek for "love of wisdom," it is the systematic, critical study of fundamental questions regarding existence, knowledge, ethics, reason, and reality. 


It employs rational argument, logic, and critical analysis to evaluate beliefs and understand the human condition, rather than relying solely on empirical observation. 


For those that are "Diametrically Opposed" to the views in the Planks below, 

there is one famous quote that is "Apropos."


"If you're taking flak, you're over the target."


"Diametrically opposed" describes two things that are completely, totally and 

directly opposite to one another. Originating from the concept of opposite ends of a circle's diameter, this phrase emphasizes maximum distance or 

difference in views, opinions, or positions.


"Apropos" (pronounced app-ruh-poh) is a French-derived term meaning fitting, opportune, or relevant to a particular situation.


"If you're taking flak, you're over the target" is a phrase of World War II origin implying that intense criticism, resistance, or opposition (Flak) indicates you are close to a significant truth or successfully challenging a major, entrenched issue. It encourages staying the course, as heavy resistance is a sign of progress. 


Bomber Planes only received Anti-Aircraft Fire (Flak) once they were over the target area. When they were approaching the target area, but still far from their goal, there was no reason for the enemy to station weaponry in an area where there were 

no important targets.


This U.S. WW II Pilot mantra is a pretty gutsy way to look at criticism... essentially saying that the more people try to shoot you down, the closer you are to a breakthrough or 

a truth they don't want you to hit.


"There is nothing more exhilarating than to be shot at without result."

- Sir Winston Churchill

1874–1965

25 Neutrality Party Platform Planks

United States Constitution

United States Constitution

United States Constitution

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."


The U.S. Constitution was written in 1787 by a convention of delegates, often called the Framers, in Philadelphia, with

 James Madison, known as the 

"Father of the Constitution" for his pivotal role.


The U.S. Constitution provides the framework by which America exists today.


The Neutrality Party believes ardently in three separate but equal 

Branches of Government.


Executive, Legislative and Judicial.


These Branches of Government should operate without the outside influence from any other Branch of Government or Governmental Agency.


This system of government was designed by the 

Framers of the Constitution 

as a way of running America.


The Constitution provides a system of Checks and Balances to ensure the continued growth and success of our great land and also prevents Corruption and the Abuse of Power by any one Branch of Government.


"In questions of power, let no more be said of confidence in man, 

but bind him down from mischief by the 

chains of the Constitution."

- Thomas Jefferson

3rd U.S. President


"Democracy descends into despotism when people neglect governance, allowing "fools" to rule, or when unrestrained liberty leads to a loss of order and respect, paving the way for a dictator to emerge from the very system meant for freedom."

- Plato

A Founder of Western Philosophy

428 - 347 B.C.


Plato claimed that democracy is a danger due to excessive freedom. He also argued that, in a system in which everyone has a right to rule, all sorts of selfish people who care nothing for the people but are only motivated by their own personal desires are able to attain power. 


The United States Constitution defines the foundational structure of the Federal Government and provides a Blueprint that, when followed, will lead to America's continued reign as the greatest country on Earth in 

the History of Time.


2nd Amendment

United States Constitution

United States Constitution

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, 

shall not be infringed."


The Neutrality Party is strongly aligned with the 2nd Amendment and believes that any qualified and eligible American has the right and privilege to own and possess firearms, as granted in the Constitution.


There are many Hot Button Issues dealing with Gun Ownership in America. The most prevalent issue is Gun Violence and Mass Shootings, in particular.


Gun Control Activists have fought for many years to achieve any measures possible that would decrease Gun Violence.


The NRA (National Rifle Association) and Gun Manufacturers have fought back and are resistant to acquiesce to the desires of these Gun Control Activists on anything that puts restrictions on Gun Ownership.


One of the biggest demands that Gun Control Activists are seeking to achieve is Universal Background Checks on individuals attempting to purchase a gun.

 

The reason for Universal Background Checks is to close existing Legal Loopholes that allow firearms to be transferred by Private Sellers, Online, or at Gun Shows without Federal Screening. 


While Federal Law requires licensed dealers to perform Background Checks, it currently exempts Private, Unlicensed Sellers, allowing for the, often, unregulated transfer of firearms.


Studies indicate that states requiring Background Checks for all handgun sales have lower firearm homicide rates, with research connecting these laws to a decrease in both Homicides and Suicides.


Universal Checks help prevent guns from being sold to, or trafficked for, people prohibited from possessing them, such as those with dangerous criminal histories or mental health restrictions.


Proponents argue these are "common sense" measures supported by a large majority of Americans, including many gun owners.


Polling consistently shows that a large majority of Americans, including many gun owners and NRA members, 

support the implementation of 

Universal Background Checks.


The Neutrality Party will push Legislation to have Universal Background Checks written into Federal Law.

Military Funding

United States Constitution

U.S. Military Veterans

The U.S. Government shall continue to fund the different branches of the Military to ensure that America remains the Super Power that it has become.


This funding will, however, undergo a complete and in-depth evaluation to ensure that every Tax Payer dollar is accounted for to ensure that waste and fraud are eliminated from the system.


A 2019 Department of Defense (DOD) Inspector General (IG) report found that one company earned excess profits on 46 of 47 parts reviewed, with profit margins as high as 4,451%. One specific part, a half-inch metal pin, was priced at $4,361, representing a roughly 9,400% excess profit over a reasonable cost.


In 2006, that same company, mentioned above, allegedly hiked the price of a crucial Apache helicopter valve by $747 (nearly 40%) and refused to ship it to the battlefield until the higher price was paid. The company maintains it follows the law and charges market prices.


Another company agreed to pay nearly a billion dollars to resolve a government investigation that exposed defective pricing and overcharging on government contracts. 


Shay Assad, a former top DoD contract negotiator, noted that the price of a Stinger missile increased sevenfold from $25,000 in 1991 to over $400,000.


  • Other notable examples:
    • A pin that cost less than a nickel was charged at $71.
    • A drain pipe segment that should have cost $1.41 was charged at $80.
    • A trash can for an E-3 Sentry radar plane was charged at $52,000.
    • An oil pressure switch bought by NASA for $328 cost the Pentagon over $10,000. 


Contractors are not legally required to disclose cost data for contracts below a certain monetary threshold (currently $2 million), or for items broadly defined as "commercial." This makes it difficult for the Pentagon to determine if prices are fair and reasonable.


Even when overcharging is identified, contractors are rarely required to issue refunds, which disincentivizes transparent pricing. 


Any Government Contractors found to be guilty of fraud or price gouging shall be penalized by severe fines and possible imprisonment, as well as losing their Government contracts.


"Rather fail with honor than 

succeed by fraud."

- Sophocles

Greek Playwright

496 - 406 B.C.

U.S. Military Veterans

Social Security Programs

U.S. Military Veterans

The entire system and programs that provide support and services to the 

U.S. Veterans shall be evaluated and improved upon.


This will be done to ensure that our honored Veterans receive the respect and care that they deserve for serving this great country.


They put their lives on the line to provide American citizens with the blanket of Freedom that they live under.


Veteran Hospitals will be upgraded with the necessary staff and personnel in order to provide the best possible care and services for these great men and women. 


These honorable, respectable Americans have made sacrifices so that we may live in peace and harmony that other, less fortunate, countries can only dream about.


A society is judged by how it treats its' veterans, a principle often attributed to George Washington, reflecting the moral obligation to support those who served.


In 2022, 6,407 veterans died by suicide, averaging over 17 per day. 


Gone are the days of forgetting those that sacrificed for our Freedoms.

Foreign Aid Programs

Social Security Programs

Social Security Programs

A complete and thorough evaluation will be conducted on all current recipients of

 U.S. Foreign Aid Programs.


Gone are the days of sending Billions of American Tax Payer Dollars to foreign countries while our school children go without a Free Lunch, our roads and highways fall into disrepair and our citizens go without much-needed Governmental Assistance Programs.


America has been the provider of assistance to numerous countries over many decades and the free handouts have to come to an end.


Our society has needs that aren't being met because we are sending Billions each year to other countries instead of taking care of our own country.


Rebuilding America to its' former Glory is a Top Priority of the Neutrality Party and charity begins at home.


Proverb:

"Charity begins at home."


Meaning: 

"One's first responsibility is for the needs of one's own family and friends."


Application:

"Take care of yourself before you take care of someone else."

Social Security Programs

Social Security Programs

Social Security Programs

Fund programs well into the future to ensure continuation for future generations.


Full and complete audit of programs for evaluation and elimination of any recipients that are fraudulent or 

ineligible for benefits. 


Purge the program of ineligible recipients.


Prosecute individuals that have received benefits illegally and recoup funding by way of fines and seizure of assets until repayment is total and complete.


Possible imprisonment for severe cases of violation.


Immigrants are ineligible for program benefits at any time. 


"We can never insure one hundred percent of the population against one hundred percent of the hazards and vicissitudes of life, but we have tried to frame a law which will give some measure of protection to the average citizen and to his family". 

- Franklin D. Roosevelt

32nd U.S. President


Social Security benefits and programs are only available for 

Natural Born or Naturalized American citizens.

Welfare Programs

Welfare Programs

Welfare Programs

The U.S. Government provides numerous programs that fall under the Welfare heading.


As with many government programs, there is waste, fraud and abuse within these Welfare Programs.


A complete evaluation will be conducted on the recipients of benefits from these programs. 


The focus will be on all Welfare Programs, but not intended to affect or eliminate elderly individuals or the disabled.


Types of abuse are individuals under-reporting their income to receive benefits, fake identities and selling or trafficking benefits by way of SNAP/EBT cards.


Welfare requires a complete overhaul to ensure that only individuals that are eligible receive the government assistance that is funded by the 

American Taxpayer.


“We should measure welfare's success by how many people leave welfare, not by how many are added”

- Ronald Reagan

40th U.S. President


Fraudsters and Abusers of the 

Welfare Programs will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

SNAP / EBT

Welfare Programs

Welfare Programs

The SNAP Program (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) offers governmental assistance to Low Income families by providing them with an EBT card (Electronic Benefits Transfer).


This program, while beneficial and helpful for many, is fraught with abuse and fraud.


A complete and in-depth evaluation of every recipient will be conducted, with fraudsters and abusers being immediately eliminated from the programs and prosecuted to the 

fullest extent of the law.


And in some cases, imprisonment will result for those individuals found to be guilty of grossly abusing the system.


This government assistance program is needed by many individuals living below the Poverty Line, but requires a thorough evaluation to ensure its' continuation in serving those in need.


"I am proud to sign the Food Stamp Act of 1964 because it is a realistic and responsible step toward the fuller and wiser use of our agricultural abundance." 

- Lyndon B. Johnson

36th U.S. President


The waste, fraud and abuse must be eliminated so that the program can continue without individuals milking the system and causing it to be eliminated altogether due their actions, thus hurting the ones that truly need the assistance.

Immigration

Welfare Programs

Elected Officials

Individuals to be found guilty of entering the U.S. illegally shall be deported to their country of origin immediately upon detainment.


Any individuals found to be guilty of crimes against American Society will serve a Term of Imprisonment based on the severity of their crimes, then deported to their country of origin upon completion of aforementioned 

Term of Imprisonment.


I.C.E. will continue to function as a Government Agency, with a renewed focus on individuals with a propensity to commit crime.


This Government Agency will no longer focus on hard-working individuals that are contributing to the American way of life by providing needed services.


Individuals that migrated to America illegally and can show a track record of being an upstanding and respectable member of American Society will be allowed to apply for Citizenship to become Naturalized Citizens.


There is no need to deport hard-working immigrants that contribute to the American Society by providing necessary services for our infrastructure.


Dreamers will be offered the opportunity to apply for Citizenship and become Naturalized Citizens of the greatest country on Earth.


Elected Officials

Elected Officials

Elected Officials

Term Limits will be instituted for the 

U.S. Congress.

Senate and House of Representatives.


No longer will there be Career Politicians that remain in their positions for years at a time and gain personal wealth while their constituents' income statuses remain static.


Gone are the days of a politician profiting by becoming an Elected Official.


In addition to Term Limits, there will be a complete and in-depth evaluation of the salaries of said Elected Officials.


No longer will U.S. Government Elected Officials be permitted to vote themselves a Pay Raise, while the average American never sees an increase in their Pay Package.


Gone are the days of Elected Officials determining their salaries without the approval of the American people.


The Neutrality Party also believes that Term Limits should be instituted for

 The Supreme Court.


In addition, any member of SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) found guilty of Corrupt Behavior or Graft shall be removed from the court and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, including large fines and possible long-term imprisonment.


Gone are the days of 

Lifetime Appointments 

with no way of eliminating Bad Apples that spoil the Bunch.

Elections

Elected Officials

Elections

“Elections belong to the people. It's their decision. If they decide to turn their back on the fire and burn their behinds, then they will just have to sit on their blisters.”
- Abraham Lincoln

16th U.S. President

The “Great Emancipator”


Any and all elections for Government Officials will be done in person, at an official Polling Station.


No longer will Mail-In Ballots be possible.


Any and all individuals wishing to cast their ballot in any election will have to present a State-Issued I.D. in the form of a legal Driver's License or 

State-Issued I.D. card.

No Exceptions.


"Let us not seek the Republican answer or the Democratic answer, but the right answer. Let us not seek to fix the blame for the past. Let us accept our own responsibility for the future." 

- John F. Kennedy
35th U.S. President


“When one with honeyed words but evil mind persuades the mob, 

great woes befall the state.”
- Euripides, Orestes


Orestes, a Greek tragedy by Euripides first performed in 408 B.C.


Any individuals found guilty of Voter Fraud will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law with substantial fines and possible imprisonment.

Taxation

Elected Officials

Elections

"No taxation without representation" is a pivotal American revolutionary slogan, often expanded by James Otis Jr. to "Taxation without representation is tyranny" around 1765. 


It originated in the 1760s to protest British taxation of American colonists without parliamentary representation, stemming from a 

1215 Magna Carta principle. 


"In this world, nothing is certain but death and taxes," is a famous proverb attributed to Benjamin Franklin in 1789. 


Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) described taxes as "the dues that we pay for the privileges of membership in an organized society."


"What is the difference between a taxidermist and a tax collector?

The taxidermist takes only your skin."

- Mark Twain

1835 - 1910


The current Tax Structure System will undergo a complete and comprehensive evaluation to ensure that the American citizen is taxed based on a fair and equal tax structure.


The American citizen shall no longer carry the burden of paying taxes above and beyond their station in life, while the wealthy avoid taxation by using Loopholes and other such tactics to avoid paying their fair share and what they owe.


No longer will "The rich get richer, while the poor get poorer" because the rich have better tax attorneys.

Health Insurance

Health Insurance

Health Insurance

The current Health Insurance System shall undergo a complete overhaul to ensure that all eligible American citizens can afford Healthcare at an affordable cost.


All billing procedures and policies by Insurance Companies shall be evaluated and corrected by the U.S. Government.


No longer will Hospitals, Physicians and Insurance Companies be allowed to overcharge and price gouge for services rendered.


Gone are the days of Hospitals charging a 500% markup for such things as an aspirin.


Prescription Medication costs will be evaluated and analyzed by the U.S. Government. Any extreme markups in cost for enormous profits by Drug Manufacturers will be severely dealt with.


Hospitals, Physicians, Insurance Companies and Drug Manufacturers found to be guilty of Price Gouging will result in severe penalties such as large fines and/or possible imprisonment.

The Environment

Health Insurance

Health Insurance

  “Here is your country. Cherish these natural wonders, cherish the natural resources, cherish the history and romance as a sacred heritage, for your children and your children’s children. Do not let selfish men or greedy interests skin your country of its' beauty, 

its' riches or its' romance.”

   – Theodore Roosevelt

26th U.S. President


The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will be refocused on protecting the environment.


This Government Agency will review any and all companies and corporations that are operating with a risk to damage or harm the environment in a negative manner.


Any company or corporation found to be in violation of EPA policies that adversely affect America's Air and Water Supply will be dealt with severely by receiving large fines and possible imprisonment.


Any company or corporation to be found guilty of causing irreparable damage to the American Eco-System are at risk of losing their business and operating licenses in the U.S.

Marijuana

Health Insurance

Penal System

The U.S. Government classification of Marijuana will be changed from a Schedule I Drug to a Schedule III.


Schedule III classification acknowledges that a drug has a currently accepted medical use in the U.S. and a lower potential for abuse compared to Schedule I (which includes heroin) or Schedule II (which includes cocaine).


Many U.S. Veterans use Marijuana to cope with PTSD that they suffer from due to their service to America.


Millions of Americans use Marijuana for a variety of Medical conditions and there is no reason why they should be arrested and prosecuted for their use of a drug that has known medical uses.


Marijuana will be legal in all 50 states. 


Marijuana businesses will be able to use Bank services for their business finances instead of having safes with large amounts of cash due to being unable to utilize the American Banking System because of the current status of Marijuana and CBD.


Taxes paid by Marijuana Businesses will be utilized to add funding to the 

Public Education System and 

School Meals Programs.

Penal System

Penal System

Penal System

Individuals prosecuted and imprisoned for Marijuana related offenses will be released from prison and have their records expunged of all Marijuana related offenses.


Any individuals currently on Parole or Probation for Marijuana related offenses will be released from such restrictions immediately and their records expunged of any and all Marijuana offenses.


Capital Punishment shall be applied to any and all individuals that commit homicide of a Law Enforcement officer or any U.S. Government Elected Official.


The Three Strikes Policy will be applied to any individual that commits three Felonies. 


This policy ensures that a Judge in any proceeding is required by law to imprison this Felon to a Life Sentence without the possibility of Parole, thus removing this repeated offender from 

American Society for good.


Term Imprisonment Limits shall be developed and instituted Nationwide to ensure consistent and standardized punishments for heinous acts such as Murder, Rape, Assault, 

Grand Larceny, etc.


Gone are the days of judges subjectively deciding the terms of imprisonment for serious crimes against Society. 


These Term Limits of Imprisonment will eliminate subjectivity from the 

Legal System and no longer allow one lenient judge to decide what He/She feels is an adequate punishment for such egregious crimes.

Minimum Wage

Penal System

Minimum Wage

The Federal Minimum Wage for 2026 remains at $7.25 per hour, a rate that has been in effect since 2009. 


In 2023, approximately 81,000 workers earned exactly the Federal Minimum Wage of $7.25 per hour, with an additional 789,000 Americans earning below that rate, totaling roughly 869,000 to 1 million hourly workers, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data. 


While several states have enacted higher minimum wages for 2026,

 the Baseline Federal Rate under the 

Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) 

has not changed. 


The Federal Minimum Wage is a rate earned by approximately 82,000 hourly workers, or 1.0% of all hourly-paid employees. 


While Federal Law holds at $7.25, 

34 states/territories have higher minimums, with many exceeding 

$15+ in 2026 

(e.g., California $16.90, D.C. $17.95)


Minimum Wage Workers are often young, with 386,000 workers aged 

16-24 earning at or below the 

Federal Rate in 2023. 


The Minimum Wage shall be increased to a level so that individuals can afford the basic necessities of life without having to work two and three jobs just to afford rent, food and Healthcare.


There is no reason why a citizen of our great country is forced to go without while the company or corporation they work for gives that CEO a multi-million dollar bonus at the end of each year.


Gone are the days of companies and corporations earning enormous profits while underpaying the individuals that allow said businesses to thrive and grow their Bottom Line.

School Meals

Penal System

Minimum Wage

In the 2023–2024 school year, nearly 29.4 million children participated daily in the National School Lunch Program (NSLP), with 21.1 million receiving free or reduced-price meals. 


Over 94,000 schools participated, making it the second-largest food assistance program behind SNAP. 


Participation rose by 6.8% in 2023–2024, driven by 

"Healthy School Meals for All" policies. 


Key School Meal Statistics 

(2023-2024 School Year)

  • Daily Participation: Over 29.4 million children, with 21.1 million receiving free/reduced-price lunch.
  • Total Lunches: Roughly 4.8 billion lunches are served annually.
  • Program Growth: 42 states and the District of Columbia saw increased participation, reversing a post-pandemic dip.
  • Breakfast Participation: Over 14.3 million children participated in school breakfast (2022-2023 data).
  • Funding: The program costs approx. $16.3 Billion annually. 
  • Impact on Health/Education: Students with access to school meals show improved Behavioral, Emotional, and Academic Outcomes, including Higher Math Scores.


The U.S. Government shall continue to ensure that school meals are provided for the American children in the 

Public Educational System.


No child will go hungry due to 

socio-economic status.


Statistics have proven that education and learning are improved for students when they are well-fed and not suffering from hunger pains.

Higher Education

Higher Education

Higher Education

A study will be conducted to evaluate the Student Loan Programs to ensure that any individual seeking to earn a 

college education is not buried under a mountain of debt for years to come after completing a Degree Plan.


Higher Education will be made more affordable and accessible to those individuals seeking to better themselves and improve their station in life.


Knowledge has the power to unlock limitless opportunities in life and shouldn't be Cost Prohibitive for those individuals that weren't born with a 

silver spoon in their mouth.


Gone are the days of being locked in a certain level of American Society by virtue of the fact that a Higher Education is unavailable due to an individual's 

Socio-Economic status or standing in society.


Child Day Care

Higher Education

Higher Education

Annual prices for Child Care range from $6,552 to $15,600 for one child. 

The National Average Price for Child Care in 2024 was $13,128.


Families spend up to 16% of their Median Income on Full-Day Care for one child.


When Child Care becomes 

"Cost - Prohibitive" - exceeding what a family can reasonably pay - it triggers a series of measurable economic and social consequences. 


For 2026, data shows that these costs have reached a tipping point, forcing significant shifts in the labor market and family planning.


The U.S. Government shall create and fund a Program that provides Child Care Services for Lower Income Families and single mothers at a reasonable cost to ensure that children are supervised while these eligible parents or single mothers earn a living to support their household.

Birth Control

Higher Education

Planned Parenthood

Approximately 54% - 65% of U.S. women aged 15 - 49 use contraception.


Female sterilization (11.5% - 18.1%), oral contraceptive pills (11.4% - 14%), and long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) (10.4% - 10.5%) are the most common methods.


  • Effectiveness:
    • Implants/IUDs: 
    • >99% effective.
    • Sterilization: 
    • 99.5% - 99.85% effective.
    • Pill/Patch/Ring: 
    • 91% - 99% effective.
    • Condoms: 
    • 82% - 98% effective.


85% of women use Birth Control to prevent pregnancy, while 14% use it for other reasons, such as managing medical conditions.


The Neutrality Party will ensure that Birth Control is made available in all 50 states and funded for individuals in need by a Government Program.

Planned Parenthood

Planned Parenthood

Planned Parenthood

According to the most recent 2023 - 2024 Annual Report,  Planned Parenthood provided 9.4 million total services to approximately 2.08 million patients.


Key Service Statistics (2022-2023 Data)

  • STI Testing & Treatment: 5,132,330 services.
  • Birth Control: 2,223,680 information and services provided.
  • Cancer Screenings: 426,268 screenings and prevention services (including Pap Tests and Breast Exams).
  • Abortion Services: 402,230 procedures, representing a 2% increase from the previous year.
  • Other Services: Includes 2,148 adoption referrals and various family practice/preventive care visits.


Financial & Operational Overview

  • Total Revenue: Approximately $2.03 Billion.
  • Government Funding: $792.2 Million (roughly 39% of total revenue), primarily from Medicaid reimbursements and Title X Grants.
  • Private Contributions: $684.1 Million.
  • Facility Reach: Nearly 600 Health Centers nationwide, with 64% located in rural or medically underserved areas.


Patient Demographics

  • Volume: One in three women in the U.S. has visited a Planned Parenthood location at least once.
  • Income Level: Over 70% of patients have incomes at or below 150% of the Federal Poverty Level. 
  • Insurance: Approximately 53% of patients rely on Public Health Programs like Medicaid. 


The Neutrality Party will work to ensure that Planned Parenthood is available in all 50 states, but Abortion is not available after 24 weeks of pregnancy.


Available for cases of Rape, Incest and extreme Medical situations that affect the health and life of the woman.


The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) has approved the abortion pill (mifepristone and misoprostol) for use up to the first 70 days (10 weeks) of pregnancy. 

Pro Choice

Planned Parenthood

Pro Choice

A woman's body, her choice.


Codifying Roe v. Wade is a Top Priority of the Neutrality Party.


Codifying Roe v. Wade would mean passing a law that would affirm a pregnant woman's right to an abortion without undue interference.


“We don't like to kill our unborn; we need them to grow up and fight our wars.”
- Marilyn Manson


Manson is mocking a mentality that expresses extreme concern for life before birth, but shows little regard for that same life once it is old enough to be sent to War by the rich and powerful whose offspring never get sent.


"If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament." 

- Florynce Kennedy

1916 - 2000 


Sacrament: a religious ceremony or ritual regarded as imparting divine grace, such as Baptism, the Eucharist and the Anointing of the Sick.


Here is an interesting scenario...


The cost to raise a child from birth to College Graduation is 

on-average $550,000.


Pro Life Advocates want to force a woman to have a child that they didn't want to have, thus saddling this woman with a bill of $550,000 over 22 years.


It would be an interesting proposition if every Pro LIfe Advocate was assessed a $10,000 Tax every year. 

This collected Tax would then be distributed to the women forced to have a child they didn't want to have in order to pay this $550,000 expense.


If you don't want to be held financially responsible for the costs of raising a child you forced someone, you don't know, to have and raise... then keep your mouth shut about someone else's 

life and body.

Period.


Never will there be a day when this proposed Pro Life Tax is ever enacted. 

It is just putting forward the idea of "putting your money where your mouth is."


If an entire group (Pro Lifers) decide and vote on the issue of Abortion that determines the financial future and subsequent monetary burden of a woman, then that group (Pro Lifers) should be held responsible for the repercussions that their vote incurs on the individual's life that they are adversely affecting.


The Principle of Accountability

When a group decides the outcome of an important issue, then that group must be held accountable for the outcomes.


If a group (Pro Lifers) vote on important, life-altering issues, but is shielded from the financial responsibilities of these votes, they are prone to take actions with no consequences to the aforementioned group.


The threat of financial liability incentivizes voters to perform due diligence, research the consequences, and act in good faith. 


Making the voting group (Pro Lifers) financially responsible forces voters to internalize the costs of their choices, leading to more deliberate and fiscally responsible decision-making. 


Pro Lifers have "no skin in the game." They are not positively nor adversely affected by voting to ban abortion.


To illustrate the Hypocrisy in American Society and Politics, here are a few examples.


In 2017, it was revealed that Rep. Tim Murphy, a staunch anti-abortion member of the House Pro-Life Caucus, who had just voted to ban abortions after 20 weeks, sent text messages to his mistress urging her to have an abortion when they had an "unfounded pregnancy scare." 


The text messages revealed the woman, Shannon Edwards, accusing him of hypocrisy, to which a reply from his phone noted his staff wrote his "Pro Life" messages. Murphy resigned shortly after the scandal. 


Rep. Scott DesJarlais (R-Tennessee): 

A "Pro Life" congressman who has voted for strict abortion restrictions, DesJarlais was revealed in 2012 to have pressured a mistress - who was also a patient - to have an abortion. It was further revealed during his divorce that his ex-wife had also had two abortions. Despite these revelations, he was re-elected.


Herschel Walker (R-Georgia): 

While running as a Republican Senate candidate in 2022, Walker - who campaigned against abortion access - faced allegations from two women that he had paid for their abortions, one of whom claimed he pressured her to terminate a pregnancy.


Scott Lloyd: A former official in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) who was known for personally blocking abortion access for pregnant, undocumented minors in federal custody, was reported to have driven an ex-girlfriend to get an abortion and paid for half of it. 


Elliot Broidy: A former RNC Deputy Finance Chairman and major Republican Fundraiser reportedly paid $1.6 million to a mistress after she became pregnant and he demanded she have an abortion.


These examples illustrate that when put in the position of being faced with an unwanted, unexpected pregnancy, persons that have consistently voted and decided the fate of women they have no concern for, will become hypocrites and eagerly opt for an abortion to maintain their way of life.


How is an uninvolved, unaccountable for the financial repercussions, group (Pro Lifers) able to decide the fate of someone they don't know, care nothing about nor will ever meet?


This is akin to sticking your nose in someone else's business.


"Sticking your nose in someone else's business" is an idiom for meddling or interfering in private matters that do not concern you. 

It implies a lack of respect for personal boundaries, often seen as rude, nosy, or intrusive behavior.


"You're not free when you can't make decisions about what you do with your own body." 

- Amnesty International

LGBTQI+

Planned Parenthood

Pro Choice

The Neutrality Party believes that every American has the right to express themselves and their chosen "identities" in whatever manner that he/she so chooses. 


Having said that, the Neutrality Party also feels that there are stipulations to go along with those choices of personal expression.


A teacher in the Public Education System couldn't place a Confederate Flag nor a Nazi Swastika Flag in their classroom to promote their personal ideologies.


No educator at any level of the 

Public Educational System shall use their classroom as a Platform for showcasing their "identity." 


Any presence of LGBTQI+ flags, images, literature, etc. will result in penalization by way of severe fines and possible Termination of Employment.


Educators employed by the Public Education System shall not dress in a manner that showcases their "identity." 


Any outlandish wardrobe choices or hair styles (i.e. Rainbow-dyed hair color, etc.) that influence, advertise or promote the LGBTQI+ lifestyle to children they are paid to educate are strictly prohibited. 


Violations will result in severe fines and possible Termination of Employment.


The Neutrality Party has no qualms with an individual's personal choices in life, but these individuals shouldn't influence children at such a young and impressionable age with lifestyle decisions that are best made after the brain is fully developed.


No public funding available for Transitional Surgeries.


No admission to Public Restrooms based on how an individual "identifies."


Public restrooms are designed for and intended to be utilized by individuals that use such facilities according to their 

sex at birth. 

No exceptions.


Violators will be punishable by severe fines and possible imprisonment if the violation is severe enough.


Pronouns are used to replace nouns in the third person. Pronouns like he/him, she/her, and they/them are linguistic tools used to refer to people.


It is not proper English to fabricate pronouns like ze/zir, xe/xem or fae/faer and demand that others use these terms to address an individual choosing these contrived Pronouns and 

take exception when others don't 

participate in that choice.


To each his/her own, just don't demand participation by others in those alternative lifestyle choices.


Many may decide to be respectful of an individual's choices of how they want to be addressed or referred to, but likewise, there are many that won't agree with the alteration of the English Language in order to create Pronouns that represent a person's chosen identity.


No Litigation will be entertained that results from a person not choosing to participate in this new evolution of Pronouns now included in the English Language and American Vernacular.


The Nomenclature developed exclusively for the LGBTQI+ Community may be opposed by many individuals living outside of the LGBTQI+ Community.


The Lifestyle Choices of said community may not be approved of by many. 

The Neutrality Party believes resolutely in every American's right and privilege to live life as they so choose.


Having stated that, the LGBTQI+ Community should not expect nor demand that every American agree with and support their individual choices.


We, as Americans and Human Beings, are all on our own individual journeys through life on this planet, we call Earth. The best way to get through life with the least resistance and hardship is to live by the Mottos... 


"Live and let live."


"Judge not lest ye be Judged."


"Treat others as you would like to be treated."


"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

TransGender Women in Women's Sports

The idea of an "individual" born as a male, then transitioning or choosing to "identify" as a woman, then deciding to compete against real women in Women's Sports is 

utterly and ridiculously, flawed and unacceptable.


The biological, physiological and anatomical differences between a man and a woman are so extreme and well-documented by Science that it is  completely unfair for a male to compete against a female in any physical sport that involves 

performance of the body.


Any "individual" born male then choosing to "identify" as a female and compete in Women's Sports, in order to achieve victory and receive the usual praise, respect and adulation that accompanies such Championships, only illustrates the aforementioned "individual's" mental shortcomings and/or undiagnosed, untreated psychological issues rooted in deriving pleasure from defeating a real woman that doesn't possess the same biological advantages of a man.


The "individuals" born male and desiring to achieve victory by competing against real women in Female Sports is totally and completely unacceptable and intolerable.


The scenario that has been proposed, as a similar example, 

by some on Social Media, is...


What if LeBron James decided to "identify" as a woman, then compete in the WNBA?


This unlikely, but acceptable scenario by advocates of TransWomen being allowed to compete against real women is an extreme example of just how ludicrous 

this World has become.


The word "Ludicrous" means foolish, unreasonable, or absurd, 

often to a comical degree. 


Views on TransGender women competing in female sports are deeply divided, balancing inclusion and fairness. A 2025 Gallup Poll found 69% of Americans believe athletes should play on teams matching their birth sex. Proponents emphasize inclusion and argue that hormone therapy mitigates advantages, while opponents cite retained physiological differences creating safety and fairness concerns.


Many argue that allowing TransGender women in female categories is "deeply unfair" due to retained male-puberty advantages, such as increased strength or bone density.


Advocates argue that banning TransGender women is discriminatory, acts as a "myth" rooted in misogyny, and that hormone therapy makes performance comparable 

to cisgender peers.


There is no universal policy on TransGender women competing in Women's Sports.  Sports Governing Bodies are increasingly setting their own rules, with some restricting participation based on testosterone levels and others, like World Athletics, banning those who went through male puberty.


While some argue against inclusion to protect women's sports, others emphasize that exclusion causes harm, bullying, and mental health issues for TransGender athletes.


The Neutrality Party argues that any "individual" born male then "identifying" female and wanting to compete, unfairly, against real women, already suffers 

from Mental Health Issues.


The only fair, but financially impossible solution would be to create a third category of Sports. This new, but fiscally improbable category would be a TransGender League for all Sports. This would allow TransGender individuals to compete against others of the same physiological composition.


Male, Female and TransGender Sport's Leagues would solve the debate with a logical solution that allowed TransGender individuals to compete in sports and have no genetic advantages over their opponents as in the case of TransGender Women competing against real women.


The debate continues, with a growing trend towards stricter, sport-specific, or 

birth-sex-based eligibility criteria, particularly at elite levels.


The International Olympic Committee (IOC) is reportedly moving toward a blanket ban on TransGender women in female categories, with a final decision expected in early 2026. This follows a trend set by federations like World Athletics and World Aquatics, which have already enacted similar restrictions.


In early 2025, President Trump signed Executive Orders, including "Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports," which prompted the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee (USOPC) to effectively ban TransGender women from women's events.


The U.S. Supreme Court heard Oral Arguments in January 2026 for landmark cases (Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J.) to determine if state bans on TransGender athletes violate the Equal Protection Clause. Legal observers suggest the Court may lean toward upholding these state-level restrictions. 


69%–79% of Americans believe athletes should only compete on teams matching their sex assigned at birth.


90%+ of Republicans support restrictions, while Democrats are more divided, with roughly 67% opposing trans women in female sports.



Younger adults (41%) and Political Liberals (57%) are the only major subgroups with significant support for inclusion.


Fairness and Safety Proponents argue that biological advantages from male puberty, such as increased bone density and muscle mass, create an inherently unequal playing field that undermines the integrity of the female category.


High-profile, extreme examples of TransGender women in sports, such as swimmer 

Lia Thomas, cyclist Veronica Ivy, and weightlifter Laurel Hubbard, have fueled intense debate over fairness versus inclusion. Views are deeply polarized between concerns about retained physical advantages, such as bone density or muscle mass from 

male puberty, and the right to compete as one's affirmed gender.


Lia Thomas became the first TransGender woman to win an NCAA Division I Title in 2022, leading to significant controversy and subsequent policy changes 

by Governing Bodies.


Critics, often citing studies on physiology, argue that TransGender women, who have gone through male puberty, retain athletic advantages (increased muscle mass, bone density, lung capacity) that persist even after testosterone reduction. The case study of a TransGender swimmer showed, for example, superior performance compared 

to female peers.


Proponents emphasize that trans women are women and should be allowed to compete without discrimination. They point out that many trans athletes do not dominate, with some performing below elite levels.


Many sports bodies are moving away from only regulating testosterone levels and instead implementing, or considering, bans on TransGender women, who have gone through male puberty, from participating in the female category, 

particularly at elite levels.


The debate over TransGender women in sports often centers on high-profile cases where athletes won major titles or competed at the elite level. These examples are frequently cited by critics who argue they represent an unfair biological advantage, while supporters point to them as evidence of successful inclusion under 

established medical guidelines.


MMA 

MMA most commonly stands for Mixed Martial Arts, a full-contact combat sport blending striking (like boxing, Muay Thai) and grappling (like wrestling, 

Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu) techniques under unified rules, aiming for knockouts, submissions, or referee stoppages.


In 2021, Alana McLaughlin won "her" professional MMA debut via submission. Critics cited "her" background as a former U.S. Army Special Forces member as evidence of an "unfair" physical advantage.


Alana McLaughlin's opponent in "her" professional MMA fight was French fighter 

Celine Provost. The fight took place at a Combate Global event in Miami, Florida, on September 10, 2021. McLaughlin won the fight by submission (rear-naked choke) in the second round, 3 minutes and 32 seconds into the round. 


The bout was McLaughlin's professional debut and marked the first time a TransGender woman competed in MMA in the United States since 2014.  


Celine Provost was a 35-year-old French striker with a background in amateur MMA and boxing. Provost was a very tough woman that wasn't able to be Knocked Out by an Ex-U.S. Army Special Forces member.


Although some argue there is no single "logical conclusion" to this issue, as it involves competing core values such as fairness, inclusion, and safety that different people and organizations prioritize differently, the Neutrality Party takes a hard and 

immoveable stance on keeping the playing field fair and safe for 

true female competitors by banning TransGender women from 

competing in Women's Sports.

Copyright © 2026 Neutrality Party - All Rights Reserved.


Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept